Question: Why does the implementation from #248 appear on `master` but not on `main`?

[moyu979]

Hi,

While investigating an HP LTO6 issue, I came across issue #241 and the corresponding fix in #248.

The implementation introduced in #248 appears to address the issue on my HP Ultrium 6 drive, and after testing locally I observed the same result.

While looking through the repository history, I noticed two things that confused me:

1. The implementation from Fix remaining capacity handling of HP LTO6 #248 appears to exist on master, but I could not find the same logic in the current default branch (main).
2. GitHub reports that master is currently 133 commits ahead of and 69 commits behind main, which suggests that the two branches have diverged significantly.

Could someone help clarify:

• What is the current relationship between master and main?
• Which branch is currently considered the primary development branch?

I may be missing some historical context here, so I wanted to ask before drawing any conclusions.

Thanks.