Doesn't support Open Annotation...

[azaroth42]

... data model serializations and it should.

See: openannotation/annotator#389

[tilgovi]

👍

[leinfelder]

After reading the pull requests about this, it sounds like the annotator-store will be able to return an OA serialization of the model in JSON-LD (as a read-only "rendering"). That's great, is there any information about how to access that rendering?
Say I can access this annotation using the current API:
GET http://annotateit.org/api/annotations/cwpnz1tERG6UTCqF-IawFA
Would I call a different endpoint, or would I include a header requesting application/ld+json?

[Treora]

The latter. The Accept header in the http request should explicitly mention application/ld+json, and prefer it above application/json if both are accepted.

To test it, I use something like:

curl localhost:5000/api/annotations -H Accept:application/ld+json

Note this behaviour is just a choice I made for now. Anything I made up to now regarding OA was really just a first step to get things going (at least from my perspective), everything can be changed if desired.

[leinfelder]

How does this relate (if at all) to the "lorestore" service and/or plugin?

https://github.com/uq-eresearch/lorestore

On Sep 24, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Gerben notifications@github.com wrote:

The latter. The Accept header in the http request should explicitly mention application/ld+json, and prefer it above application/json if both are accepted.

To test it, I use something like:

curl localhost:5000/api/annotations -H Accept:application/ld+json

Note this behaviour is just a choice I made for now. Anything I made up to now regarding OA was really just a first step to get things going (at least from my perspective), everything can be changed if desired.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[tilgovi]

If I recall correctly that transforms between OA and Annotator's internal
format at serialization/deserialization.

It's possibly a good start, and may provide something very useful for
migrating, but we may wish to bring format changes inside Annotator. I'm
not sure.
On Sep 25, 2014 10:56 AM, "leinfelder" notifications@github.com wrote:

How does this relate (if at all) to the "lorestore" service and/or plugin?

https://github.com/uq-eresearch/lorestore

On Sep 24, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Gerben notifications@github.com wrote:

The latter. The Accept header in the http request should explicitly
mention application/ld+json, and prefer it above application/json if
both are accepted.

To test it, I use something like:

curl localhost:5000/api/annotations -H Accept:application/ld+json

Note this behaviour is just a choice I made for now. Anything I made up
to now regarding OA was really just a first step to get things going (at
least from my perspective), everything can be changed if desired.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#74 (comment)
.