A routine set of extensions

[sjehuda]

Greetings.

I think, that it would be beneficial to have a routine (i.e. "default", so called) set of extensions upon first installation.

These extensions will be disabled, and the users will have to manuallly activate them.

Doing so, would allow to demonstrate the capabilities of this software, which would subsequently influence more people to utilize Userscript.

Some extensions that may be qualified are these.

https://greasyfork.org/scripts/465933-cleanurls

https://greasyfork.org/scripts/465932-newspaper

https://greasyfork.org/scripts/465953-enforce-https (Maybe there are better than this one)

https://greasyfork.org/scripts/465950-no-referrer

https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/490282-ruffle-flash-player

https://openuserjs.org/scripts/navchandar/Open_Current_Tab_via_Web_Archive

I wrote those to browsers that thankfully do not have "webextensions", such as QuteBrowser, Falkon and Otter Browser.

[CodFrm]

Thank you for your suggestion, but we are not currently planning to add default userscript. If we do add any, it would only be one with very basic userscript.