Use centralized Claude Code Review workflow

[justin808]

Summary

• Replaces inline Claude Code Review workflow with a call to the shared reusable workflow in shakacode/.github
• Removes hardcoded model — uses Claude Code's default (currently Opus 4.6)
• Future changes only need one update in shakacode/.github

Dependencies

• Requires shakacode/.github#4 to be merged first

Test plan

• Merge Add reusable Claude Code Review workflow .github#4 first
• Merge this PR
• Verify review triggers on next PR

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal code review workflow configuration to use a reusable external workflow, improving maintainability and consistency across the organization.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for Claude Code Review is refactored to use an external reusable workflow instead of inline steps. The internal implementation including checkout, action invocation, and configuration is removed and replaced with a reference to an external workflow from shakacode/.github, maintaining secret token passage.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow Refactoring .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml	Replaced inline Claude Code Review implementation (checkout, action invocation, prompts, configuration) with a reusable external workflow reference delegated to shakacode/.github. Token secret properly passed through configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A helper from afar now tends our review,
No need to keep it close, our workflow's through!
One call instead of many—delegation's art,
The code review magic, outsourced from the start! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly and clearly describes the main change: replacing an inline workflow with a centralized Claude Code Review workflow reference.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch jg/use-centralized-review-workflow

---

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[greptile-apps]

Greptile Overview

Greptile Summary

This PR simplifies the local Claude Code Review workflow by delegating the entire claude-review job to the centralized reusable workflow hosted in shakacode/.github, and passes through the repository’s CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN secret.

Net effect is that future changes to the review logic are managed centrally, but the review behavior in this repo becomes dependent on the referenced reusable workflow ref and its declared inputs/secrets/permissions.

Confidence Score: 3/5

• This PR is likely safe to merge, but the workflow may break or change behavior unexpectedly due to how the reusable workflow is referenced and integrated.
• The change is small and limited to GitHub Actions, but it introduces a hard dependency on an external reusable workflow. Referencing @main makes behavior non-deterministic over time, and the explicit secret mapping must match the upstream workflow_call contract or the workflow will fail validation at runtime.
• .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml (verify reusable workflow ref pinning and upstream workflow_call inputs/secrets)

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml	Replaces the local Claude Code Review job with a call to the reusable workflow in shakacode/.github on the main ref; verify ref pinning and required permissions/inputs align with the reusable workflow.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
  participant GH as GitHub PR Event
  participant Repo as This repo workflow
  participant Shared as shakacode/.github reusable workflow
  participant Action as anthropics/claude-code-action
  participant API as GitHub API

  GH->>Repo: pull_request (opened/synchronize)
  Repo->>Shared: uses reusable workflow (@ref)
  Shared->>Action: run Claude Code Review
  Action->>API: fetch PR diff / metadata
  Action->>API: post review comment/status

Loading

[greptile-apps]

_{1 file reviewed, 2 comments}

_{Edit Code Review Agent Settings | Greptile}

[greptile-apps]

Unpinned reusable workflow ref

This calls the reusable workflow at shakacode/.github/...@main, which means behavior can change without a PR in this repo and can break review runs unexpectedly. Pin to an immutable ref (tag or commit SHA) for stability, and bump it intentionally when you want updates.

[greptile-apps]

Secret mapping may not match

secrets: CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN: ... only works if the called reusable workflow declares on: workflow_call with a secrets: CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN entry. If the upstream expects a differently named secret or uses secrets: inherit, this workflow will fail at runtime with a validation error; confirm alignment with shakacode/.github and update accordingly.

[github-actions]

🚀 Quick Review App Commands

Welcome! Here are the commands you can use in this PR:

/deploy-review-app

Deploy your PR branch for testing

/delete-review-app

Remove the review app when done

/help

Show detailed instructions, environment setup, and configuration options.

---

[github-actions]

✅ Review app for PR #695 was successfully deleted

View Completed Delete Logs

Control Plane Organization