ledger: record the prlanded verification for PR #2637

[BigSimmo]

Summary

• Adds the immutable review record produced by npm run ledger:append for the merged sidebar reliability fix (PR fix(sidebar): switch modes in place and stop a stale UI-change flag swallowing navigation #2637), scope prlanded.
• Verification recorded: merge commit ee0cf48 has a tree identical to branch tip a943909 (git diff --stat empty), fix commit 1a6adff is an ancestor of origin/main, no late or orphaned commits, and GitHub had already deleted the remote branch.

Verification

• npx prettier --check on the new record — All matched files use Prettier code style!
• Verification not run: npm run verify:pr-local — docs-only ledger record; the docs/workflow contract checks run in CI.

Risk and rollout

• Risk: none; one append-only documentation record.
• Rollback: revert the commit.
• Provider or production effects: None
• RAG impact: none

Clinical Governance Preflight

Not applicable: documentation record only.

Notes

• Same-name branch restarted from the latest main after PR fix(sidebar): switch modes in place and stop a stale UI-change flag swallowing navigation #2637 merged, per the merged-branch rule.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01Cm7QVRJrR4gkA7SyN61EoF

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only ledger append with no runtime, provider, or production effects.

Overview
Adds a single append-only branch review record under docs/branch-review-records/ for scope prlanded, documenting post-merge verification of PR #2637 (sidebar reliability on claude/side-navigation-reliability-0sg48b).

The row captures merge commit ee0cf48, checks that its tree matches branch tip a943909, that fix commit 1a6adff is on origin/main, and notes CI/PR state. The narrative line summarizes the landed product change (sidebar shortcuts use onSelectMode; useHomeModeSeed one-shot UI flag)—for ledger context only; this PR does not change application code.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d204dce. Configure here.}

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: d13a325d-2c04-4648-9caf-c334f5ce507d

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-07T09:44:49.685939Z	d204dce	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[cursor]

Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reached

Bugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit.

A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard.

(requestId: serverGenReqId_f762d1c6-409b-4072-aaf3-b5a8694a99ce)

[supabase]

This pull request has been ignored for the connected project sjrfecxgysukkwxsowpy because there are no changes detected in supabase directory. You can change this behaviour in Project Integrations Settings ↗︎.

---

Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase Branching ↗︎.

[BigSimmo]

Consolidated into #2736 at db6376e. The complete original head d204dce is retained as an ancestor, including its code, tests and audit requests. Closing this duplicate review/CI stream under the authorised consolidation; source branch retained. Current verification and remaining merge prerequisites are recorded on #2736. This closure does not claim that the successor is merged or that its required CI is green.