Skip to content

Jnowowakow/fix avatar when undelete in offline#88120

Open
jnowakow wants to merge 3 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:jnowowakow/fix-avatar-when-undelete-in-offline
Open

Jnowowakow/fix avatar when undelete in offline#88120
jnowakow wants to merge 3 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:jnowowakow/fix-avatar-when-undelete-in-offline

Conversation

@jnowakow
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Bug 1 — Avatar opens "Not here" page
Optimistically created action missed actorID which should be equal to current user.

Bug 2 — Confirm page loads infinitely
Search always return originalCurrency for transactions even if it is not set. (Auth code). It was copied to transaction object when transaction was undeleted even if it shouldn't be there. The proper fix it to modify backend code but this PR provides hot fix (not copying originalCurrency when it is equal to currency. originalCurrency is used to display loading page:

const isLoading = !!transaction?.originalCurrency;

Fixed Issues

$ #88034
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
avatar-and-submit.mov

@jnowakow jnowakow requested review from a team as code owners April 16, 2026 14:07
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from rojiphil and trjExpensify and removed request for a team and trjExpensify April 16, 2026 14:07
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 16, 2026

@rojiphil Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 16, 2026 14:07
@jnowakow jnowakow requested review from a team and luacmartins April 16, 2026 14:07
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from joekaufmanexpensify and stitesExpensify and removed request for a team April 16, 2026 14:07
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 16, 2026

@stitesExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 407053d2e8

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +1070 to +1071
originalAmount: shouldCopyOriginalAmount ? transaction.originalAmount : null,
originalCurrency: shouldCopyOriginalCurrency ? transaction.originalCurrency : null,
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore original FX fields on move failure

The optimistic merge now force-clears originalAmount and originalCurrency, but the corresponding failure rollback for this transaction still restores only reportID, comment, and converted-amount state. If CHANGE_TRANSACTIONS_REPORT fails (offline/server error), these optimistic nulls persist and the transaction loses its prior original-currency metadata, which can leave incorrect values in UI/search until a full refetch.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

...transaction,
reportID,
comment,
originalAmount: shouldCopyOriginalAmount ? transaction.originalAmount : null,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-6 (docs)

The optimistic data now explicitly overrides originalAmount and originalCurrency (setting them to null when they match amount/currency), but the failureData block at lines 1081-1090 does not restore these fields. If the API call fails, originalAmount and originalCurrency will remain null instead of being reverted to their original values from transaction.originalAmount and transaction.originalCurrency.

Every field explicitly overridden in optimisticData should have a corresponding restoration in failureData. Add the original values to the failure block:

failureData.push({
    onyxMethod: Onyx.METHOD.MERGE,
    key: `${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.TRANSACTION}${transaction.transactionID}`,
    value: {
        reportID: transaction.reportID,
        comment: transaction.comment,
        originalAmount: transaction.originalAmount,
        originalCurrency: transaction.originalCurrency,
        ...(shouldClearAmount && {pendingAction: transaction.pendingAction ?? null}),
        ...(shouldClearAmount && {convertedAmount: transaction.convertedAmount}),
    },
});

Reviewed at: 407053d | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rojiphil are you available to review this one?

@rojiphil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes. Available. Will come to this one soon.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looking into this one now.

@rojiphil
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jnowakow For consistency, let us reset the values of originalAmount and originalCurrency in failureData as mentioned in codex review. Otherwise, the changes LGTM.

88120-web-chrome-001.mp4

@luacmartins luacmartins removed the request for review from stitesExpensify April 17, 2026 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants