[No QA] Docs updates for E/A#96603 correct member vs admin room open flow

[MelvinBot]

Explanation of Change

#96603 removed the workspaceRoomsPage beta and released the Workspace Rooms page (the Rooms directory) to all workspace members and admins.

The existing help article Find Rooms in a Workspace already covers the feature and contained no beta-gating language, so it did not need to be un-gated. However, it described the row-click behavior inaccurately for members.

Per WorkspaceRoomsPage.tsx, selecting a room behaves differently by role:

• Workspace admins → open the room details page (which has a Go to room action).
• Workspace members → open the room conversation directly (no details page, no Go to room step).

The article previously said everyone opens a details page and then clicks Go to room. This PR corrects the navigation steps and the "What happens after you open a room" section to distinguish the admin and member flows.

Files changed

• docs/articles/new-expensify/chat/Find-Rooms-in-a-Workspace.md

---

@sumo-slonik, please review the files changed and confirm they reflect the current behavior. Then mark this PR Ready for review.

[sumo-slonik]

I'm on it

[sumo-slonik]

LGTM 🚀

[github-actions]

HelpDot Documentation Review

Overall Assessment

This PR makes a small, targeted correction to Find-Rooms-in-a-Workspace.md to reflect the behavior change from #96603 (the Workspace Rooms page released to all members and admins). The edits correct the room-open flow so it distinguishes between Workspace admins (open the room details page, then Go to room) and Workspace members (open the conversation directly). The change is accurate, well-scoped, and improves correctness. All feedback below applies only to the modified lines.

Scores Summary

• Readability: 9/10 - The rewritten "What happens after you open a room" section is clear and scannable, using a role-based bullet list. One trailing-whitespace nit on the "displays the rooms you can access" line.
• AI Readiness: 9/10 - Task-based headings, full feature names (Rooms directory, Workspace admins/members), and complete YAML metadata including internalScope are all present and unchanged. The edits keep the single-workflow focus intact.
• Style Compliance: 9/10 - UI labels (Rooms, Go to room, Workspaces), sentence casing, and the unified navigation phrasing "(on the left on web, on the bottom on mobile)" all follow HELPSITE_NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md. Terminology (Workspace member/admin) is correct.

Key Findings

• Accurate correction: the previous text implied every user opens a details page then clicks Go to room; the new version correctly splits admin vs. member flows, matching WorkspaceRoomsPage.tsx.
• Good consistency fix: adding the missing period to step 1 aligns it with the other numbered steps.
• Minor nit: a trailing space was introduced at the end of the line "The Rooms directory displays the rooms you can access in that workspace. " - remove it.
• Note (not blocking): HELP_AUTHORING_GUIDELINES.md Section 6 says to avoid combining Admin + Member flows "unless inseparable." Here they are genuinely inseparable (same action, divergent outcome), so the role-based bullet treatment is appropriate.

Recommendations

• Remove the trailing whitespace on the "displays the rooms you can access in that workspace." line.
• Optional: consider whether the shortened step 3 ("Select a room from the list.") should briefly point readers to the "What happens after you open a room" section, since the outcome now varies by role. Not required.

Files Reviewed

• docs/articles/new-expensify/chat/Find-Rooms-in-a-Workspace.md - Approved with one minor whitespace nit. Correction is accurate and compliant with governance.

Note: Detailed line-by-line feedback has been provided as inline comments.

[melvin-bot]

Concierge reviewer checklist:

• I have verified the accuracy of the article
  • The article is within a hub that makes sense, and the navigation is correct
  • All processes, screenshots, and examples align with current product behavior.
  • All links within the doc have been verified for correct destination and functionality.
• I have verified the readability of the article
  • The article's language is clear, concise, and free of jargon.
  • The grammar, spelling, and punctuation are correct.
  • The article contains at least one image, or that an image is not necessary
• I have verified the formatting of the article
  • The article has consistent formatting (headings, bullet points, etc.) with other HelpDot articles and that aligns with the HelpDot formatting standards.
  • The article has proper text spacing and breaks for readability.
• I have verified the article has the appropriate tone and style
  • The article's tone is professional, friendly, and suitable for the target audience.
  • The article's tone, terminology, and voice are consistent throughout.
• I have verified the overall quality of the article
  • The article is not missing any information, nor does it contain redundant information.
  • The article fully addresses user needs.
• I have verified that all requested improvements have been addressed

For more detailed instructions on completing this checklist, see How do I review a HelpDot PR as a Concierge Team member?

cc @CortneyOfstad

[melvin-bot]

@CortneyOfstad Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[OSBotify]

A preview of your ExpensifyHelp changes have been deployed to https://0f91f8e0.helpdot.pages.dev ⚡️

Updated articles:

• articles/new-expensify/chat/Find-Rooms-in-a-Workspace