Skip to content

TICKET-583: Include due date in LTI gradebook sync#7872

Draft
Naragod wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
TICKET-583_lti_sync_due_date
Draft

TICKET-583: Include due date in LTI gradebook sync#7872
Naragod wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
TICKET-583_lti_sync_due_date

Conversation

@Naragod
Copy link
Contributor

@Naragod Naragod commented Mar 20, 2026

Proposed Changes 🐛 Bug fix

When creating or updating a gradebook item via LTI, MarkUs sends a line item payload to Canvas containing the assignment label, resource ID, and maximum score. The dueAt field supported by the LTI Assignment and Grade Services (AGS) specification was missing from this payload, and the due date set in MarkUs remained absent on the corresponding Canvas assignment. The fix adds dueAt as an ISO 8601 timestamp to the payload when the assessment has a due date, ensuring it is synced during both line item creation and updates.

Screenshots of your changes (if applicable)
Associated documentation repository pull request (if applicable)

Type of Change

(Write an X or a brief description next to the type or types that best describe your changes.)

Type Applies?
🚨 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue) X
🎨 User interface change (change to user interface; provide screenshots)
♻️ Refactoring (internal change to codebase, without changing functionality)
🚦 Test update (change that only adds or modifies tests)
📦 Dependency update (change that updates a dependency)
🔧 Internal (change that only affects developers or continuous integration)

Checklist

(Complete each of the following items for your pull request. Indicate that you have completed an item by changing the [ ] into a [x] in the raw text, or by clicking on the checkbox in the rendered description on GitHub.)

Before opening your pull request:

  • I have performed a self-review of my changes.
    • Check that all changed files included in this pull request are intentional changes.
    • Check that all changes are relevant to the purpose of this pull request, as described above.
  • I have added tests for my changes, if applicable.
    • This is required for all bug fixes and new features.
  • I have updated the project documentation, if applicable.
    • This is required for new features.
  • If this is my first contribution, I have added myself to the list of contributors.

After opening your pull request:

  • I have updated the project Changelog (this is required for all changes).
  • I have verified that the pre-commit.ci checks have passed.
  • I have verified that the CI tests have passed.
  • I have reviewed the test coverage changes reported by Coveralls.
  • I have requested a review from a project maintainer.

Questions and Comments

(Include any questions or comments you have regarding your changes.)

@Naragod Naragod marked this pull request as draft March 20, 2026 21:05
@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 23362414972

Details

  • 7 of 7 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.001%) to 91.676%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 23091690132: 0.001%
Covered Lines: 45084
Relevant Lines: 48364

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants