Skip to content

feat: gem acquisition info#9941

Open
Broseaoph wants to merge 1 commit into
PathOfBuildingCommunity:devfrom
Broseaoph:gem-acquisition-sources
Open

feat: gem acquisition info#9941
Broseaoph wants to merge 1 commit into
PathOfBuildingCommunity:devfrom
Broseaoph:gem-acquisition-sources

Conversation

@Broseaoph

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes # .
NA - feature.

Description of the problem being solved:

Currently, in order to figure out where a gem is obtained from, you have to either search the POE Wiki, or make a guess at what Act in the campaign a gem comes from based on it lets level 1 gem requirement, both methods that add friction for new / casual players who may not have gem acquisition information memorized. This streamlines the process of following a POB / building a character through the campaign.

Steps taken to verify a working solution:

  • Tested across dozens of skill gems, audited against POE Wiki / DB for accurate acquisition sources.
  • Pulled gem acquisition information mostly from POE Wiki cargo tables.

Link to a build that showcases this PR: NA

Before screenshot:

image

After screenshot:

image

PS: This is my first contribution here, please provide any and all feedback and/or criticisms necessary to get this feature in a state worthy of being merged!

@LocalIdentity LocalIdentity added the enhancement New feature, calculation, or mod label Jul 17, 2026
@vaisest

vaisest commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You might want to have a look at #9892. It's not merged yet, but it ports item and tree skill tooltips which are already included in PoB2. I imagine this will have conflicts with that

Also, is the data manually added? I'm not sure how the maintainers like taking data from the wiki (I'm also considering taking foulborn mod info from there), but it should for sure be easily re-exportable as when GGG makes changes it's a lot of work to correct it in PoB

Edit: @LocalIdentity mentioned that manual data here isn't a problem since this rarely changes. Still, if you did this with a script perhaps it should be included

Edit2: #9892 is merged now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature, calculation, or mod

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants