Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Record the Colorado AMT deduction addback source conflict and retain the section 63 deduction base. We preserve the statutory reading while documenting the Department's broader instruction to exclude duplicates.
Colorado applies the section 39-22-104 modifications under C.R.S. 39-22-105(2)(a). Filers compute the deduction addback from deductions claimed under section 63, pursuant to (3)(p.5) and (3)(p.7). The General Assembly does not expressly require substituting deductions allowed for federal AMT.
The Department of Revenue tells filers to exclude duplicate federal adjustments in its 2025 DR 0104AMT instructions, page 1. The Department coordinates other Colorado addbacks under Rule 39-22-104(3)(p.5), paragraphs (1) and (3), without addressing this federal AMT overlap.
Add candidate
us-co:dr0104amt-line-2-duplication-bar, capture the deciding instruction excerpt, and test the retained reading for itemizers and standard deduction filers. This follows up on #10099, which merged before this branch started from main.Hand computations
For a single itemizer earning $450,000, itemized deductions total $30,000: $5,000 state income tax, $5,000 property tax and $20,000 mortgage interest. Federal AMTI equals $430,000. The IRS publishes the 2025 exemption and 2026 exemption and standard deduction.
Both readings leave these households with zero Colorado AMT. A single standard deduction filer with the same wages retains an addback of $3,750 in 2025 and $15,100 in 2026, giving Colorado AMTI of $365,650 and $375,000.
Invariants
Every household's result equals main because we retain every formula, parameter value and input. We test both itemizer expectations, zero Colorado AMT and standard deduction cases in
co_alternative_minimum_taxable_income.yaml. We validate the candidate and marker workflow withtest_source_conflicts.py.Validation
make format: passed Ruff formatting and checks.Methodology choices
Microsimulation impact
To be measured before merge.
axiom: n/a: We document an existing reading and add tests without changing an encoded provision. After merge, contributors can register and pin the candidate's implementation and cases.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code