feat(cmd) add database-list-plans

[curzolapierre]

➜  scalingo database-list-plans postgresql-ng
┌────────────────────────────────────┬────────────────────┐
│                 ID                 │        NAME        │
├────────────────────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
│ postgresql-ng-starter-1024         │ Starter 1G         │
│ postgresql-dr-starter-4096         │ Starter 4G         │
│ postgresql-dr-business-4096        │ Business 4G        │
│ postgresql-ng-enterprise-4096      │ Enterprise 4G      │
└────────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────┘

• Add a changelog entry in the section "To Be Released" of CHANGELOG.md

[matthieu526-scalingo]

There is not ticket linked in the branch or the PR, won't that fail our internal compliance?
Also, why is this command required? Do we want to duplicate the command?

[matthieu526-scalingo]

question: do we want a failsafe on the technology? Because here nothing prevents to ask for SR plans, correct?

[curzolapierre]

Yes and I think it's still good at least for now. It'll be changed by DBFCC

[matthieu526-scalingo]

Alright.

[notion-workspace]

🗒️ [FEAT][CLI] Add list plans information

[curzolapierre]

There is not ticket linked in the branch or the PR, won't that fail our internal compliance?
Also, why is this command required? Do we want to duplicate the command?

I've linked the related story, is its content answering to your questions?

[matthieu526-scalingo]

Alright.

[matthieu526-scalingo]

There is not ticket linked in the branch or the PR, won't that fail our internal compliance?
Also, why is this command required? Do we want to duplicate the command?

I've linked the related story, is its content answering to your questions?

Yes thanks, it totally answers the question. I approved already.
One nitpick question, is it possible to create aliases for commands? In order not to duplicate the code, but create just a reference?

[curzolapierre]

One nitpick question, is it possible to create aliases for commands? In order not to duplicate the code, but create just a reference?

Yes I could have used alias but IMO it's worth it to have this duplication for both: 1. specify "database" error 2. already have the preview command. We'll just have to change the logic behind.