Invalid assumption of a class to be a factory

[tusharmath]

Overview
Uglify converts all class names to single letter lower case ones the factory provider automatically get created instead of the class provider. This should help rectify it.

Reproducable: always
Browsers: Chrome 39.0.2171.95
Operating System: OS X
Steps to reproduce

• Create two classes inside a closure

(function () {
    var di = require('di');

    function Apples(b) {
        this.bapples = b;
    }

    Apples.prototype.print = function () {
        console.log(this.bapples.getMyName());
    };

    function Bapples() {}
    Bapples.prototype.getMyName = function () {
        return 'My Name is TUshar';
    };

    di.annotate(Apples, new di.Inject(Bapples));

    injector = new di.Injector();
    a = injector.get(Apples);
    a.print();
})();

• run the code - works perfectly fine
• minify the source

! function () {
    var e = require("di"),
        Injector = e.Injector;

    function t() {
        // this.bapples = t
    }
    injector = new Injector();
    a = injector.get(t);
    a.print();
}();

• run the code (minified version), throws the following error -

    a.print();
      ^
TypeError: Cannot call method 'print' of undefined
    at /Users/tusharmathur/Documents/Projects/Executables/JavaScript.min.js:11:4
    at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/tusharmathur/Documents/Projects/Executables/JavaScript.min.js:12:2)
    at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:474:10)
    at Module.load (module.js:356:32)
    at Function.Module._load (module.js:312:12)
    at Function.Module.runMain (module.js:497:10)
    at startup (node.js:119:16)
    at node.js:929:3

[tusharmath]

@vojtajina Not sure why the build is failing. I see that it doesn't even work in master. Would it be possible to merge without the build passing? This issue is not letting my patch go to production :(

[iammerrick]

Indeed seeing this issue.

[tusharmath]

@vojtajina Can you please comment if this can be merged?

[iammerrick]

I don't know that having prototype methods means something is a class. I think we need to be more explicit.

[tusharmath]

I totally agree. But this logic is already being used to differentiate between classes and function . This pull request only refines the hack for the time being so that people who are using it in production don't face issues