Skip to content

feat: add new field source to Nova config#397

Open
amazeAmazing wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:release_v2from
amazeAmazing:release_v2
Open

feat: add new field source to Nova config#397
amazeAmazing wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:release_v2from
amazeAmazing:release_v2

Conversation

@amazeAmazing
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@amazeAmazing amazeAmazing commented Mar 26, 2026

What's changing and why?

  • Nova recipes are adding a new field called source under the run config to contain what source triggered the SMHP job for Nova models. I am adjusting the validation to accept this new field.

Change is not needed on mainline branch at this point as Nova Forge SDK has a dependency on the V2 package version.

Before/After UX

Before:

User who pass a source field under run for Nova recipes failed validation.

After:

User who pass a source field under run for Nova recipes pass validation.

User experience will not change for users who directly use the Sagemaker Hyperpod CLI, as no recipes in the sagemaker-hyperpod-recipes package will change.

However, for customers who use the Nova Forge SDK, the Nova Forge SDK will populate this field in their recipe for SMHP Nova recipes.

How was this change tested?

Locally tested this change and validating that the training images supported this field.

Are unit tests added?

No

Are integration tests added?

No

Reviewer Guidelines

‼️ Merge Requirements: PRs with failing integration tests cannot be merged without justification.

One of the following must be true:

  • All automated PR checks pass
  • Failed tests include local run results/screenshots proving they work
  • Changes are documentation-only

@amazeAmazing amazeAmazing marked this pull request as ready for review March 30, 2026 14:40
@amazeAmazing amazeAmazing requested a review from a team as a code owner March 30, 2026 14:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant