[DNM] Test that CI successfully fails#41
Draft
cgwalters wants to merge 1 commit intobootc-dev:mainfrom
Draft
Conversation
I think a good pattern is to keep an open (draft) pull request that *should* fail CI, and verify that it actually does. It's surprisingly easily to e.g. have CI not actually test the code. In this case we have our "reverse dependency testing" which patches the crate to use the local code, and that could easily not work.
612c965 to
19a827f
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Heh well, due to the semantics of where I chose to inject an error, it turns out this causes us to hang indefinitely...which is definitely a bug. |
Collaborator
Author
Success! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think a good pattern is to keep an open (draft) pull request that should fail CI, and verify that it actually does.
It's surprisingly easily to e.g. have CI not actually test the code. In this case we have our "reverse dependency testing" which patches the crate to use the local code, and that could easily not work.