Skip to content

Replace manual use of index newtypes bundles[bundle.index()] with Index impls and typed Vec wrappers #62

Description

@cfallin

Right now, regalloc2 uses an entity-component-system sort of pattern with toplevel Vecs of LiveBundle, VRegData, and the like, and newtype'd index wrappers like LiveBundleIndex, VRegIndex, etc. We have a whole bunch of instances of self.bundles[bundle.index()]....

Ideally we would make bundles a Vec-wrapper type that has an Index implementation that natively takes LiveBundleIndex, and then we could make all of these sites slightly less verbose.

Activity

  1. Amanieu commented on Jun 28, 2022

    @Amanieu
    Contributor

    Could we just use cranelift-entity for this?

  2. bjorn3 commented on Jun 28, 2022

    @bjorn3
    Contributor

    That would likely require moving cranelift-entity out of the wasmtime repo and independently versioning it. Otherwise you are pretty much stuck with two copies in case you are compiling cranelift.

  3. cfallin commented on Jun 28, 2022

    @cfallin
    MemberAuthor

    Yeah I'd be hesitant to introduce a circular dependency in general between repositories. (Perhaps cranelift-entity really should be its own little independent library, but that's a slightly bigger question...)

  4. fitzgen commented on Jul 5, 2022

    @fitzgen
    Member

    Or regalloc2 should be under cranelift/ in the Wasmtime repo.

  5. cfallin commented on Jul 5, 2022

    @cfallin
    MemberAuthor

    That's a much bigger discussion as well... at the time at least, we had good reasons to not do that: different (lighter-weight) CI here, historical precedent wrt regalloc.rs, general modularity (I would argue by default separable libraries should be separate, and the burden of argument is on the consolidation side, but that's of course subjective...). I'm not completely opposed to it now but that's a big thing to re-consider especially now that it's established, others have forked and contributed, may have direct references to it. Basically subsuming the whole repo into another one feels out of proportion to the upside "can use a nice indexing type". (Of course if anyone feels strongly about this they're welcome to create a toplevel issue for it!)

  6. Amanieu commented on Sep 6, 2022

    @Amanieu
    Contributor

    That would likely require moving cranelift-entity out of the wasmtime repo and independently versioning it. Otherwise you are pretty much stuck with two copies in case you are compiling cranelift.

    Is this resolved by the upcoming Wasmtime 1.0 release?

    FWIW I'm already using cranelift-entity outside of Cranelift, for my own compiler.

  7. bjorn3 commented on Sep 6, 2022

    @bjorn3
    Contributor

    If regalloc2 were to use cranelift-entity as is, you would get two copies of cranelift-entity. One used by regalloc2 from crates.io and one used by cranelift part of this repo.

  8. Amanieu commented on Sep 7, 2022

    @Amanieu
    Contributor

    Not if cranelift-entity was 1.0, since the 2 uses would be semver-compatible and Cargo would satisfy both of them with a single dependency version.

  9. bjorn3 commented on Sep 7, 2022

    @bjorn3
    Contributor

    I don't think that works when one of the versions is from crates.io and the other is a path dependency.

  10. cfallin commented on Sep 7, 2022

    @cfallin
    MemberAuthor

    The switch to 1.0-series versions (bumping major number at each release) don't change anything here, I think; the plan is still for each release to be a semver bump wrt the last one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions