You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would just take the possible candidates to match the first peak and the possible candidates to match the second peak and then evaluate all the possibilities based on the J between those 2 peaks and try to match the rest "precisely". For 13C the 1Hz seems reasonable.
Activity
targos commentedon Sep 1, 2026
The combinations quickly explode.
Luc is wondering why this part of the code is so complex.
lpatiny commentedon Sep 1, 2026
I would just take the possible candidates to match the first peak and the possible candidates to match the second peak and then evaluate all the possibilities based on the J between those 2 peaks and try to match the rest "precisely". For 13C the 1Hz seems reasonable.
jobo322 commentedon Sep 3, 2026
This function uses brutal force combination, and there is several noise taken as peaks, I am looking a better implementation.
jobo322 commentedon Sep 3, 2026
You can see the peaks around the solvent signal
jobo322 commentedon Sep 16, 2026
The new version of nmr-processing was updated in: