Skip to content

Document adversarial temporal graph problem statement#801

Open
shubuexe wants to merge 5 commits intocodemistic:mainfrom
shubuexe:Adversarial-Temporal-Graph-with-Stateful-Encodin
Open

Document adversarial temporal graph problem statement#801
shubuexe wants to merge 5 commits intocodemistic:mainfrom
shubuexe:Adversarial-Temporal-Graph-with-Stateful-Encodin

Conversation

@shubuexe
Copy link

Added problem statement for adversarial temporal graph with constraints and examples.

Added problem statement for adversarial temporal graph with constraints and examples.
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings March 21, 2026 19:02
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a new markdown document describing an “adversarial temporal graph with stateful encoding” problem, including rules, constraints, and examples.

Changes:

  • Introduces a written problem statement with graph/path constraints and an adversarial relabeling twist.
  • Defines an encoding objective and forbidden-substring constraint.
  • Adds two illustrative input examples.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

shubuexe and others added 4 commits March 22, 2026 00:38
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@shubuexe
Copy link
Author

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread

1 similar comment
@shubuexe
Copy link
Author

@copilot open a new pull request to apply changes based on the comments in this thread

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants