Skip to content

Conversation

@vanitasvitae
Copy link
Contributor

@vanitasvitae vanitasvitae commented Apr 2, 2024

As of 2020, attacks against SHA1 need to be considered practical. It is therefore recommended to move on to a more secure hash algorithm.

Other OpenPGP implementations, such as Sequoia-PGP moved on as well. See e.g. https://sequoia-pgp.org/blog/2023/02/01/202302-happy-sha1-day/

Forked out of #48

As of 2020, attacks against SHA1 need to be considered practical.
It is therefore recommended to move on to a more secure hash algorithm.

Other OpenPGP implementations, such as Sequoia-PGP moved on as well.
See e.g. https://sequoia-pgp.org/blog/2023/02/01/202302-happy-sha1-day/
@ctron ctron merged commit 840f390 into eclipse:master Apr 2, 2024
@vanitasvitae vanitasvitae deleted the sha256 branch April 2, 2024 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants