Skip to content

Consider pointing folks to other TLS solutions #99

Open

Description

@technetos

Hi! I was hanging out in office hours and I asked a question about the state of hyper-tls and if there were plans to retire it. There are a few other better tls implementations that we could direct folks to instead in documentation. @seanmonstar Pointed out making an issue to start this discussion might be a good idea.

Example:

Activity

  1. hanefi commented on Mar 6, 2023

    @hanefi

    Does this mean that there won't be a hyper-tls release that is compatible with hyper v1.0?

  2. bouk commented on Mar 25, 2024

    @bouk

    I think a more appropriate replacement is https://github.com/rustls/hyper-rustls instead of tokio-rustls

  3. v-kat commented on May 31, 2024

    @v-kat

    Are there still any plans to support alternatives?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions