cmd/loop: drop misleading static loop-in fee warning#1125
cmd/loop: drop misleading static loop-in fee warning#1125hieblmi merged 1 commit intolightninglabs:masterfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request cleans up the user interface by removing a potentially confusing warning message regarding on-chain fees for static address loop-ins. The changes ensure that the command output is more concise and accurate, while also updating the documentation and adding a test to prevent regressions. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request removes redundant informational messages regarding on-chain fees for static address loop-ins from the CLI output and updates the documentation to match. It also introduces a new test suite to verify the display logic. Feedback was provided to improve the test's resource management by ensuring all pipe writers are closed within the cleanup function to prevent potential leaks or hangs.
e14ad47 to
7669abe
Compare
| "Previously deposited on-chain: 250000 sat") | ||
| require.Contains(t, output, | ||
| "Estimated total fee: 386 sat") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we really need a test for this specific change? We don't have CLI tests overall yet. When #1072 is ready, we can just add it there as a recorded session.
7669abe to
08e94a7
Compare
08e94a7 to
b5d2677
Compare
No description provided.