Skip to content

feat(xpkg): publish 0.0.61 execution boundaries - #516

Merged
Sunrisepeak merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/xpkg-boundary-641
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

Sunrisepeak merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/xpkg-boundary-641

Conversation

@Sunrisepeak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Add libxpkg 0.0.61 to the three platform blocks. This version supplies the external execution boundaries used by openxlings/xlings#641 for restricted Lua workers, including recipe metadata and index build scripts. Existing versions and descriptor form remain available.

Upstream: openxlings/libxpkg#46, merged after CI passed, tag 0.0.61 at 76fa7493c1832851b3b0498ebd640d8b33998436.

Downloaded the exact GitHub source archive (172513 bytes) and uploaded those same bytes to the CN mirror. GitCode GET returned 200; both hashes are ee1e1a6dd2367a50fd9cd13f179367aa8638b9fa83410bdda60cd4bdb54b9019.

Local validation: upstream LLVM build and GCC test suite passed (4 programs); descriptor parses with mcpp. Client integration continues in openxlings/xlings#641.

@Sunrisepeak
Sunrisepeak merged commit b2f1e69 into main Oct 8, 2026
11 checks passed
@Sunrisepeak
Sunrisepeak deleted the feat/xpkg-boundary-641 branch October 8, 2026 00:15
Aimol-l pushed a commit to Aimol-l/mcpp-index that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2026
…cpplibs#266)

MCPP_VERSION 2026.8.27.1 -> 2026.8.27.2.

mcpplibs#263 moved this pin seventeen versions forward, to 2026.8.27.1. That is the
version PR mcpplibs#260 is failing on, and the failure is not mcpplibs#260's:

  error: internal: unhandled exception: No mapping for the Unicode character
  exists in the target multi-byte code page.

three times, in `workspace (windows default 0/2)` and `1/2` — one per httplib
example. It is mcpp-community/mcpp#516: on Windows `path::string()` converts
through the process ANSI code page and throws for a name that code page cannot
spell, and `is_excluded_walk_dir` narrowed a directory name on the first line
of the glob walk. cpp-httplib ships `test/www/<CJK>Dir/`, and the
`include_dirs = { "*" }` convention walks the whole extracted tarball.

Fixed in mcpp 2026.8.27.2 (mcpp-community/mcpp#517), released and mirrored on
both hosts, with xim-pkgindex's `latest` pointing at it.

⚠️ RE-RUNNING mcpplibs#260 WITHOUT THIS BUMP PROVES NOTHING. Its CI would fetch
2026.8.27.1 — the version that still carries the defect — and reproduce the
same three errors. That is a re-confirmation of the bug, not a test of the fix.
Attribution first: the failing job's log was read and it is mcpplibs#516's message
verbatim, not some other Windows problem wearing the same red.

Keeping mcpplibs#263's caution in force: a red at this pin can come from the engine
change or from what accumulated across the versions this repository never ran
against, and a one-sided reading cannot tell them apart.
Aimol-l pushed a commit to Aimol-l/mcpp-index that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2026
…#267)

* Validate against the engine that fixes what this index tripped over

MCPP_VERSION 2026.8.27.1 -> 2026.8.27.2.

mcpplibs#263 moved this pin seventeen versions forward, to 2026.8.27.1. That is the
version PR mcpplibs#260 is failing on, and the failure is not mcpplibs#260's:

  error: internal: unhandled exception: No mapping for the Unicode character
  exists in the target multi-byte code page.

three times, in `workspace (windows default 0/2)` and `1/2` — one per httplib
example. It is mcpp-community/mcpp#516: on Windows `path::string()` converts
through the process ANSI code page and throws for a name that code page cannot
spell, and `is_excluded_walk_dir` narrowed a directory name on the first line
of the glob walk. cpp-httplib ships `test/www/<CJK>Dir/`, and the
`include_dirs = { "*" }` convention walks the whole extracted tarball.

Fixed in mcpp 2026.8.27.2 (mcpp-community/mcpp#517), released and mirrored on
both hosts, with xim-pkgindex's `latest` pointing at it.

⚠️ RE-RUNNING mcpplibs#260 WITHOUT THIS BUMP PROVES NOTHING. Its CI would fetch
2026.8.27.1 — the version that still carries the defect — and reproduce the
same three errors. That is a re-confirmation of the bug, not a test of the fix.
Attribution first: the failing job's log was read and it is mcpplibs#516's message
verbatim, not some other Windows problem wearing the same red.

Keeping mcpplibs#263's caution in force: a red at this pin can come from the engine
change or from what accumulated across the versions this repository never ran
against, and a one-sided reading cannot tell them apart.

* Five packages: the routes openkal 0.8's atoms made possible

    openkal-musl          0.4.0 -> 0.5.0
    openkal-macos         0.4.0 -> 0.5.0
    openkal-windows       0.2.0 -> 0.3.0
    openkal-llvm-runtime  0.2.0 -> 0.3.0
    sbase                 0.1.1 -> 0.1.2

The specification does not move. openkal 0.8 already carried the atoms;
what changed is that the layers above and below now use them --- the
socket family upon `openkal.net', datagrams upon `openkal.datagram',
`poll' and `select' upon `openkal.timeout', and `fork' composed above
`openkal.space'. Reported as mcpplibs/openkal-linux#13 and
mcpplibs/openkal-musl#13.

`openkal-windows' provides four of the five and declines `openkal.space'
in terms: this system starts a NAMED PROGRAM and has no primitive that
copies an address space, so a program calling `kal_space_start' fails at
the link naming the operation, which is clause 6.1's report.

`sbase' had been pinned below 0.4.0 --- a caret on a 0.x version bounds
it under the next minor --- so ninety-seven utilities were testing a C
library two minors behind the one everything else builds against.

⚠️ EVERY HASH WAS FETCHED BACK BEFORE IT WAS WRITTEN HERE. The publisher
tags, uploads, and then RETRIEVES the CN asset and compares its bytes;
this index records one sha256 for two URLs, and a wrong digit produces a
package that resolves, downloads and fails verification on every machine
but the one that published it. Both mirrors were then read a second time,
independently of the publisher, and all ten fetches matched.

---------

Co-authored-by: speak-agent <x.d2learn.org@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant