Add simulation-validation protocol and validate-simulation template#100
Merged
Alan-Jowett merged 4 commits intomicrosoft:mainfrom Mar 29, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Phase 2 of microsoft#91 — adds circuit simulation review capability. - Protocol: simulation-validation (analysis) — 6-phase methodology covering setup verification (stimuli, models, measurement points), result extraction, constraint compliance checking, corner-case assessment (voltage/load/temperature corners), model validity evaluation (manufacturer vs generic, parasitic completeness), and simulation coverage summary. - Template: validate-simulation — uses electrical-engineer persona + protocol + investigation-report format. Reviews SPICE output, power budgets, and thermal analysis against specification constraints. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Adds PromptKit support for validating circuit simulation artifacts by introducing a dedicated analysis protocol and a corresponding template that outputs an investigation report.
Changes:
- Added a new analysis protocol for systematic simulation setup/results/constraint/corner/model review.
- Added a new
validate-simulationtemplate that composes guardrails + the new protocol and outputs an investigation report. - Registered the new protocol/template in
manifest.yaml.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| templates/validate-simulation.md | New template to review simulation output vs requirements using investigation-report output. |
| protocols/analysis/simulation-validation.md | New 6-phase analysis protocol for simulation validation methodology. |
| manifest.yaml | Registers the new protocol and template for bootstrap/assembly and CI validation. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Phase 2 of #91 — adds circuit simulation review capability. Reviews SPICE output, power budget calculations, and thermal analysis against specification constraints.
New Components
Protocol Phases
Design Decisions
Checklist