[python] fix gen internal models - #11639
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Libba Lawrence (l0lawrence)
requested review from
ChenxiJiang333,
catalinaperalta,
iscai-msft,
Kashif Khan (kashifkhan),
Laurent Mazuel (lmazuel),
Mark Cowlishaw (markcowl),
Yuchao Yan (msyyc),
Chenjie Shi (tadelesh),
Timothee Guerin (timotheeguerin) and
Jeff Fisher (xirzec)
as code owners
August 12, 2026 16:30
commit: |
Contributor
|
All changed packages have been documented.
Show changes
|
Contributor
Python emitter diffBaseline Diff summary: 5 file(s), +2 / -169 Rendered diff: inline on the run summary, or the emitter-diff-html artifact. Informational check (eng/emitter-diff); does not block the PR. |
|
You can try these changes here
|
iscai-msft
approved these changes
Aug 12, 2026
Yuchao Yan (msyyc)
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We are currently generating typeddict models unrelated to the operations (specifically for azure-storage-fileshare I noticed typeddicts generated that were not referenced in any operation even transitively) is this intended? They are input models so the
is_usage_inputflag tags them as things we should generate, but they are not actively referenced in an operation overloadSupersedes #11567 (moved head branch to upstream so emitter-diff runs).