Bug fix: Implementing futures_io::AsyncBufRead is not straightforward.#12
Open
cheako wants to merge 6 commits intorust-bakery:mainfrom
Open
Bug fix: Implementing futures_io::AsyncBufRead is not straightforward.#12cheako wants to merge 6 commits intorust-bakery:mainfrom
cheako wants to merge 6 commits intorust-bakery:mainfrom
Conversation
Reduce dependencies on futures crate
Author
|
Looking at it, it could probably be done better... I'm just tied down with other things. |
Author
|
Fixes: #10 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This contains the other two PRs.
I can't find the function that did this, but it was something like if Ready is returned and then Pending immediately leads to panic. As such, if there is any data in a BufReader poll_fill_buf can not, by circular logic, read more async data... Because it can not call read and then return Pending, so it would be a blocking read call.
As such, there is no way to implement a nom wrapper AND a BufReader, because nom may need more data even if there is some data and this violates the conditions of implementing a BufReader.