Skip to content

Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked#155586

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
oli-obk:assert-ignored-feed
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked#155586
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
oli-obk:assert-ignored-feed

Conversation

@oli-obk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@oli-obk oli-obk commented Apr 21, 2026

follow-up to #153489

I don't expect this to ever really be an issue, but better safe than sorry 😆

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 21, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 21, 2026

r? @dingxiangfei2009

rustbot has assigned @dingxiangfei2009.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: compiler, types
  • compiler, types expanded to 72 candidates
  • Random selection from 18 candidates

@petrochenkov petrochenkov self-assigned this Apr 21, 2026
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

📌 Commit b1c7595 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 21, 2026
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
…rochenkov

Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked

follow-up to rust-lang#153489

I don't expect this to ever really be an issue, but better safe than sorry 😆
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
…rochenkov

Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked

follow-up to rust-lang#153489

I don't expect this to ever really be an issue, but better safe than sorry 😆
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
…rochenkov

Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked

follow-up to rust-lang#153489

I don't expect this to ever really be an issue, but better safe than sorry 😆
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #155028 (tests: add whitespace tests for vertical tab behavior)
 - #155582 (Rewrite `FlatMapInPlace`.)
 - #151194 (Fix wrong suggestion for returning async closure)
 - #154377 (Fix `#[expect(dead_code)]` liveness propagation)
 - #155572 (Move diagnostic attribute target checks from check_attr)
 - #155586 (Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked)
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
Rollup merge of #155586 - oli-obk:assert-ignored-feed, r=petrochenkov

Ensure we don't feed owners from ast lowering if we ever make that query tracked

follow-up to #153489

I don't expect this to ever really be an issue, but better safe than sorry 😆
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot merged commit b646067 into rust-lang:main Apr 21, 2026
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.97.0 milestone Apr 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants