Skip to content

Comments

rustdoc.md: consistently use ./x rather than ./x.py#2780

Merged
jyn514 merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
DanielEScherzer:patch-1
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

rustdoc.md: consistently use ./x rather than ./x.py#2780
jyn514 merged 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
DanielEScherzer:patch-1

Conversation

@DanielEScherzer
Copy link
Contributor

Most of the commands were specified with ./x, but three of the commands were using ./x.py without a clear reason - align with the guide's convention of using ./x.

Most of the commands were specified with `./x`, but three of the commands were
using `./x.py` without a clear reason - align with the guide's convention of
using `./x`.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 19, 2026

Thanks for the PR. If you have write access, feel free to merge this PR if it does not need reviews. You can request a review using r? rustc-dev-guide or r? <username>.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content label Feb 19, 2026
@DanielEScherzer
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? rustc-dev-guide

@jyn514 jyn514 merged commit 78a974d into rust-lang:main Feb 20, 2026
1 check passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content label Feb 20, 2026
@DanielEScherzer DanielEScherzer deleted the patch-1 branch February 20, 2026 00:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants