Add ability to individually package functions

[wootencl]

Quick pass at adding individual packaging functionality. Mostly looked at the AWS implementation and tried to create parity between here and there.

@pmuens Happy to add tests + get linting, etc. in order if this is something you'd be willing to merge. Mostly don't want to sink any more time into this if that's not the case.

Fixes: #89

[simonasdev]

would love to see this merged :D

[saiaman]

any news ?

[saiaman]

Quick pass at adding individual packaging functionality. Mostly looked at the AWS implementation and tried to create parity between here and there.

@pmuens Happy to add tests + get linting, etc. in order if this is something you'd be willing to merge. Mostly don't want to sink any more time into this if that's not the case.

Fixes: #89

Can you please patch eslint problems in order to get travis working ?

[wootencl]

@saiaman Feel free to fork my fork and create another PR with the eslint problems resolved if desired. At current I'm unfortunately a bit strapped for time and don't want to invest any more into this particularly with the relative inactivity of this repo.

[markmssd]

@wootencl perhaps assigning other maintainers to the repo would help? I'm willing to give a hand, I'm sure other people would do.

[markmssd]

@wootencl I've tested your changes, it deploys functions properly 👍

Couple of points I noticed:

• It doesn't work anymore without the individually option
• All the functions upload with the same .zip size. Is that normal? I suppose it is right?
• *EDIT: A lot of unit tests are failing

Let's join forces to fix them!

[wootencl]

@markmssd I'll admit, my availability is opening up a bit so could possibly lend a hand in maintaining this repo. Ultimately though, that decision is up to @pmuens.

[sushilkg]

Bump.