Improved recording file name formatting handling#1675
Merged
aleksandr-voitenko merged 5 commits intostagingfrom Apr 24, 2026
Merged
Improved recording file name formatting handling#1675aleksandr-voitenko merged 5 commits intostagingfrom
aleksandr-voitenko merged 5 commits intostagingfrom
Conversation
40358fa to
363d6c7
Compare
summeroff
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This fixes the recording filename formatter so advanced filename patterns are applied correctly when starting recordings.
Overall, this change makes the current formatter more aligned with the upstream changes.
The formatter had several issues:
%swas not handled1920x1080-13This change:
obs_video_info *instead of a raw width/height pair%s%FPS,%CRES,%ORES, and%VFtest_osn_advanced_recording.tsMotivation and Context
This was the runtime half of the “Recordings do not follow Advanced Filename Formatting” issue.
Before this change, recordings could ignore parts of the configured format and fall back to names that looked like:
2026-04-22 16-12-121920x1080-13After this change, the configured advanced filename pattern is used as expected.
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes