chore[array]: `fill_null` remove compute entry point #6437

Performance Regression: -18.28%

⚡ 5 improved benchmarks
❌ 14 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1116 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1268 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_opt_bool_into_canonical[(10, 1000)]`	2 ms	1.5 ms	+35.18%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_opt_bool_into_canonical[(1000, 10)]`	167.2 µs	150.4 µs	+11.22%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_opt_bool_into_canonical[(100, 100)]`	893.8 µs	773.7 µs	+15.52%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_into_canonical[(10, 1000)]`	3.1 ms	2.6 ms	+19.75%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_opt_into_canonical[(10, 1000)]`	11.7 ms	10.6 ms	+10.41%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_200k_dispersed`	4.7 ms	5.6 ms	-16.57%
❌	Simulation	`patched_take_200k_first_chunk_only`	4.8 ms	5.4 ms	-10.68%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(10000, 16, 4)]`	525.3 µs	607.1 µs	-13.48%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(1000, 4, 4)]`	364 µs	445.4 µs	-18.26%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(10000, 4, 4)]`	525.3 µs	607.4 µs	-13.52%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(1000, 4, 8)]`	365.6 µs	447.2 µs	-18.24%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(10000, 16, 8)]`	573.6 µs	656 µs	-12.57%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(1000, 16, 8)]`	387 µs	467.9 µs	-17.29%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(1000, 16, 4)]`	364.7 µs	445.4 µs	-18.12%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(1000, 64, 8)]`	375.5 µs	456.9 µs	-17.81%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(10000, 64, 8)]`	536.3 µs	618.2 µs	-13.24%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(10000, 4, 8)]`	534.4 µs	617 µs	-13.38%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(10000, 64, 4)]`	524.9 µs	607.2 µs	-13.56%
❌	Simulation	`pushdown_compare[(1000, 64, 4)]`	364.3 µs	445.8 µs	-18.28%

_{Comparing ji/fill-null-final (4adb2c2) with develop (dbe0ff5)²}

1268 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on develop (007ef8c) during the generation of this report, so dbe0ff5 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩