ci: reject implicit engine buffer allocation - #9672
Conversation
5b79473 to
2f3e584
Compare
Merging this PR will improve performance by 51.2%
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_neon[16384] |
20.4 µs | 13.5 µs | +51.2% |
Tip
Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing ngates/buffer-allocator-enforce (7976d61) with ngates/buffer-allocator-execution (cd00ce3)
Footnotes
-
206 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
4 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩
2f3e584 to
d578a0a
Compare
5be81fc to
13894b2
Compare
36176c7 to
24c4ffc
Compare
24c4ffc to
7837e58
Compare
7837e58 to
092912f
Compare
092912f to
e5fea5f
Compare
0aa2518 to
5014df5
Compare
5014df5 to
1bd0883
Compare
1bd0883 to
1edde31
Compare
1edde31 to
b9c94d9
Compare
b9c94d9 to
1ac1fd9
Compare
68d5db4 to
34c9a8a
Compare
f21e047 to
87e6daf
Compare
eedc0f8 to
fc0be30
Compare
fc0be30 to
b09ec24
Compare
b09ec24 to
3e98c72
Compare
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Gates <nick@nickgates.com>
3e98c72 to
7976d61
Compare
Summary
Reject implicit buffer allocation in engine code.
Changes