Skip to content

Attach RowFn validity directly to canonical output - #9694

Draft
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
ct/primitive-comparison-simdfrom
ct/row-fn-canonical-validity
Draft

Attach RowFn validity directly to canonical output#9694
connortsui20 wants to merge 1 commit into
ct/primitive-comparison-simdfrom
ct/row-fn-canonical-validity

Conversation

@connortsui20

@connortsui20 connortsui20 commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Attaches input-derived validity directly when a RowFn kernel already returns a canonical array, avoiding an extra lazy vortex.mask execution. Non-canonical output keeps the existing lazy mask path.

Changes

Reuses mask_validity_canonical without copying canonical value buffers and preserves kernel-output validation, output relabeling, and outer nullability. Structural Boolean and primitive tests verify that nullable dense execution no longer runs vortex.mask.

@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 17%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 2089 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 206 skipped benchmarks1
🗄️ 4 archived benchmarks run2

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
WallTime arrow_checked_add_u32_avx2[16384] 17.7 µs 21.3 µs -17%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ct/row-fn-canonical-validity (8208687) with ct/primitive-comparison-simd (6bb6d93)3

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 206 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. 4 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

  3. No successful run was found on ct/primitive-comparison-simd (d7f1683) during the generation of this report, so 4e4e412 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@connortsui20
connortsui20 force-pushed the ct/row-fn-canonical-validity branch 2 times, most recently from 84cde9e to c72fbbe Compare August 28, 2026 19:19
@connortsui20 connortsui20 added the changelog/performance A performance improvement label Aug 28, 2026
@connortsui20
connortsui20 force-pushed the ct/row-fn-canonical-validity branch from c72fbbe to 8df4c19 Compare August 28, 2026 19:40
@robert3005

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

generally not a fan of optimisations like these...

@connortsui20

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

I think it shows a gap in our abstraction, ideally this is not required for this optimization?

@connortsui20
connortsui20 force-pushed the ct/row-fn-canonical-validity branch from 8df4c19 to b464dd5 Compare August 29, 2026 00:37
Base automatically changed from ct/row-fn-constant-decode to develop August 29, 2026 02:00
@connortsui20
connortsui20 force-pushed the ct/row-fn-canonical-validity branch from b464dd5 to f17be3d Compare August 29, 2026 02:00
@connortsui20
connortsui20 marked this pull request as draft August 29, 2026 15:00
@connortsui20
connortsui20 force-pushed the ct/row-fn-canonical-validity branch from f17be3d to 89e5590 Compare August 29, 2026 23:33
Comment on lines +106 to +119
Validity::Array(validity_array) => {
let values = if let Some(canonical) = values.as_opt::<AnyCanonical>() {
mask_validity_canonical(
Canonical::from(canonical),
Validity::Array(validity_array),
ctx,
)?
.into_array()
} else {
values.mask(validity_array)?
};

self.finalize_output(values, self.row_count)
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's something sketchy in the profile here and I would have to trace more of the code to figure out what's wrong. In the develop version we seem to execute the mask while in the new one we don't. Ah... I think this is because the benchmark is executing to AnyCanonical and this change here immediately flattens the mask into value instead of doing another execution round. Ultimately I think this is not useful benchmaxxing.

Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
@connortsui20
connortsui20 force-pushed the ct/row-fn-canonical-validity branch 3 times, most recently from 89e5590 to 8208687 Compare August 31, 2026 18:24
@connortsui20
connortsui20 changed the base branch from develop to ct/primitive-comparison-simd August 31, 2026 18:26
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 84.61538% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.22%. Comparing base (d7f1683) to head (8208687).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../src/scalar_fn/unstable/row/batch/execute/dense.rs 80.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...ex-array/src/scalar_fn/unstable/row/batch/tests.rs 87.50% 2 Missing ⚠️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/performance A performance improvement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants